Paul Tondeur
2009-05-01 10:54:31 UTC
Hi all,
Does anybody have experience with the new released COLLADA Max NextGen
exporter? It works fine for exporting models, until you want to export
animations. At least, that's as it seems right now.
When I load a model that was exported using the nextgen exporter, I
get the following error in flash:
[ERROR] DaeDocument#readNextAnimation : TypeError: Error #1010: A term
is undefined and has no properties.
This is caused by the DAE class on line 657, where it is looping
through all the animation channels. Animation.channels equals to null.
When I export using the same model using the normal COLLADA Max
exporter, the error disappears. Using the COLLADA Max NextGen exporter
is essential for 3ds Max 2010 users, as the older exporter doesn't
work for this new version of Max.
Both COLLADA files have information in the XML, regarding animation.
I'm not a COLLADA expert, but I can imagine that if I edit the nextgen
exported file manually, I could make this work. Has anybody done this
before?
Thanks in advance,
Paul
Does anybody have experience with the new released COLLADA Max NextGen
exporter? It works fine for exporting models, until you want to export
animations. At least, that's as it seems right now.
When I load a model that was exported using the nextgen exporter, I
get the following error in flash:
[ERROR] DaeDocument#readNextAnimation : TypeError: Error #1010: A term
is undefined and has no properties.
This is caused by the DAE class on line 657, where it is looping
through all the animation channels. Animation.channels equals to null.
When I export using the same model using the normal COLLADA Max
exporter, the error disappears. Using the COLLADA Max NextGen exporter
is essential for 3ds Max 2010 users, as the older exporter doesn't
work for this new version of Max.
Both COLLADA files have information in the XML, regarding animation.
I'm not a COLLADA expert, but I can imagine that if I edit the nextgen
exported file manually, I could make this work. Has anybody done this
before?
Thanks in advance,
Paul